COVID-19 Update! We are still open, we are now doing free zoom and telephonic consultations and limited in office.
Please call us at (918) 216-9644 for any help.

The Law Office of Carlos L. Williams

Call For A Consultation

(918) 216-9644

Se Habla Español

The Law Office of Carlos L. Williams

Supreme Court To Decide DUI Related Issue


Last month, the Supreme Court agreed to take jurisdiction on a case addressing a DUI related issue: whether, in the absence of a warrant, a state may make it a crime for a person to refuse to take a chemical test to detect the presence of alcohol in the person’s blood. Approximately two years ago, the Supreme Court addressed whether a forced blood alcohol blood draw was permissible under the exigent circumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. In that case. the Supreme Court held that police must generally obtain a warrant before subjecting a drunken-driving suspect to a blood test, and that the natural metabolism of blood alcohol does not establish a per se exigency that would justify a blood draw without consent.

For more information on the Fourth Amendment and Exigent Circumstances, check out our prior blog post here.

Minnesota law makes it a criminal offense for a person who has been arrested for driving while impaired to refuse to submit to a chemical test of the person’s blood, breath, or urine to detect the presence of alcohol. Although the State acknowledges that such tests do not serve the purposes of officer safety or evidence preservation, a divided Minnesota Supreme Court held that a person may be compelled to submit to a warrantless breath test as a “search incident to arrest.” From that starting point, the court held that the State may make refusal to submit to such a test a criminal offense. The question presented is: Whether, in the absence of a warrant, a State may make it a crime for a person to refuse to take a chemical test to detect the presence of alcohol in the person’s blood.

It is not currently a crime to refuse a chemical test following a DUI arrest in Oklahoma. However, there are administrative penalties involved with refusal. For a more thorough discussion on implied consent and refusing a blood alcohol test, view our prior post on the subject here. If you are in need of a Tulsa DUI lawyer, contact our office at (918) 216-9644 for a consultation. Our Tulsa Criminal Defense Lawyer has more than fifteen years defending Oklahomans accused of crimes. Put our experience to work for you.

About the Author Carlos Williams & Associates, PLLC is a firm that services the Oklahoma
community. Over the years, we have demonstrated our skills and expertise
as a leading single source for legal support throughout Oklahoma.

Translate »